Aiso gives you a window into real AI conversations through its consent-based user panel - and that's a genuinely useful data source. Omnia gives you that visibility plus an execution engine that turns insights into content actions you can run the same day. If you need a tool that works end-to-end today, not one that promises execution features on a roadmap, the difference matters.
Trusted by teams building AI visibility across Europe
Both track AI visibility. The difference is how often, how deep, and what you get when the data comes back.
Omnia covers extensively four engines where buying decisions are made. Real browser sessions. Actual geographic locations. Citation data down to the URL. And an action layer that converts every gap into something your team can ship.
Tracking tools show you a score. Omnia shows you the source. Every citation tracked to URL level, classified by page type, owned, third-party, or social. Then it reverse-engineers the pattern into a content brief, a placement target, and a task list your team can execute this week.
Citations shift when new content is indexed, when competitors publish, and when models update. Omnia captures those changes that same day.
Content briefs, outreach targets, and week-by-week task lists built from citation data so your team can plan and execute quickly.
Every source AI engines reference is tracked to the exact URL — yours, a competitor's, or a third-party domain you should be targeting for placements.
Every query runs through a real browser session in an actual geographic location. The same prompt from New York and Madrid returns different recommendations. With Omnia, you can capture both.
Both tools address a real problem: brands are invisible in AI-generated answers and need a way to track and improve that. The deciding factor is whether you need a tool that covers monitoring, analysis, and execution in a single platform today, or one focused primarily on real conversation data with execution features arriving later.
You need to go from visibility data to content action in the same session - not export a report and figure it out yourself.You want daily automated monitoring across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, and Google AI Mode with real browser execution.You need citation intelligence that shows which sources AI engines actually pull from, not just what users ask.You want sentiment analysis so you know how AI engines frame your brand, not just whether they mention it.You need an MCP connector that pipes AI visibility data into your existing tools and workflows.Teams at Iberia Cards, The Power MBA, and INDYA use Omnia to track AI visibility across markets — not just monitor it
Read their stories
You want access to real AI conversations from a consent-based user panel - genuine prompt data from opted-in users is AISO's strongest differentiator.Your primary goal right now is understanding conversational intent patterns (what real people ask AI) rather than executing content changes.You're comfortable waiting for core workflow features (Content Engine, Crawlability Audit, Schema Generator) that are on the roadmap but not yet shipped.You value AISO's early-stage positioning and the credibility signals it has built in the AI visibility category.
Aiso tracks ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode, and Claude. Omnia tracks ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, and Google AI Mode - with Claude, Gemini, and CoPilot available as add-ons. The difference that matters for most B2B teams is understanding where your users are, and Omnia gives you that and actionable layer to get started quickly.
AISO's panel data is a genuine differentiator for understanding what people ask AI engines. Omnia takes a different approach: real browser execution across engines, daily, capturing the actual answers and citations your prospects see. Both data models have value. The question is whether you need to understand what people ask (AISO's strength) or what AI engines answer and cite (Omnia's strength) - and whether you need to act on that data in the same tool.
AISO's Starter plan ($79/mo) covers Conversation Explorer and Fan-outs - essentially browsing real AI conversations. Omnia's base plan (from €79/mo) includes daily monitoring, citation intelligence, sentiment analysis, content suggestions, and the MCP connector across four core engines. Compare what ships at each price point, not just the number on the page.
Not yet. AISO's Content Engine is listed on its Growth plan ($239/mo) but is currently marked "Coming soon," along with eight other workflow features. Omnia's content suggestions and execution guidance are live today.
Omnia runs real browser sessions across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, and Google AI Mode daily. Additional engines (Claude, Gemini, CoPilot) are available as add-ons. AISO lists ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode, and Claude
Yes. Omnia's MCP connector lets you pipe visibility insights into your development environment or IDE. AISO offers integrations with Shopify, WordPress, Webflow, and analytics platforms, but does not have an MCP connector or equivalent workflow integration for AI visibility data.
AISO addresses a real problem with a distinct approach - real prompt data from opted-in users. Its Conversation Explorer and Fan-outs features are live and useful for understanding conversational intent. The challenge is that most of its workflow and execution features are not yet shipped, which limits what you can do with the insights today. If you need a tool that goes beyond tracking to action, that's where the products diverge.
